Why Dedicated Critique Tools Matter
"Can't I just use Slack?" This is the most common question we hear about design critique tools. Before diving into specific tools, it's worth understanding what design critique actually is and how it differs from general feedback or review processes.
❌ What happens with generic tools (Slack, email, comments):
- • Subjective opinions without frameworks ("I don't like this blue")
- • Feedback gets lost in chat threads or email chains
- • No visual context or design principle guidance
- • Inconsistent quality across different reviewers
- • Time wasted on back-and-forth clarifications
✅ What dedicated critique tools provide:
- • Structured frameworks based on design principles
- • Visual context with annotations and screenshots
- • Consistent evaluation criteria across all reviews
- • Actionable feedback with specific improvement suggestions
- • Organized history for tracking iterations and decisions
The difference isn't just convenience — it's feedback quality. Generic tools collect opinions. Critique tools provide structured evaluation that actually improves your design work. Once you choose the right tool, our step-by-step guide to running design critiques will help you use it effectively.
Types of Critique Tools
Design critique tools fall into four main categories, each with different strengths:
Async Feedback
Point-and-click comments on designs
Examples: Figma Comments, Markup.io, InVision
Structured Critique
Framework-based evaluation with design principles
Examples: The Crit, Designship, UX Review templates
Project Management
Feedback integrated with workflow and task management
Examples: Linear, Notion, Asana with design templates
Video Feedback
Screen recordings for detailed explanations
Examples: Loom, Screencastify, BugHerd
Quick Comparison
How do the major critique tools stack up on key features?
| Feature | Figma | Markup | The Crit | Designship | Linear | Loom |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Instant feedback | ||||||
| AI-powered analysis | ||||||
| Design principle guidance | ||||||
| Visual annotations | ||||||
| Works with any file type | ||||||
| Structured critique framework | ||||||
| Real-time collaboration | ||||||
| Free tier available | ||||||
| 24/7 availability |
Async Feedback Tools
These tools let stakeholders add comments directly on designs without scheduling meetings.
Figma Comments
Built-in commenting for Figma designs
Pricing
Free with Figma
Included in all Figma plans
Best For
Teams already using Figma for design work
✓ Pros
- No additional tool needed
- Comments attached to specific design elements
- Real-time collaboration and notifications
- Version history and threaded conversations
- Easy stakeholder access via sharing links
✗ Cons
- Limited to Figma files only
- No structured critique framework
- Comments can get overwhelming in complex files
- No design principle guidance or AI assistance
- Difficult to track feedback across multiple projects
Our Take: Perfect for Figma-native teams, but lacks structured critique frameworks.
Markup.io
Visual feedback on websites and images
Pricing
Free plan available
$15-25/user/month for teams
Best For
Website reviews and visual bug reporting
✓ Pros
- Works on live websites and static images
- Simple point-and-click annotations
- No account needed for reviewers
- Chrome extension for easy access
- Integrates with project management tools
✗ Cons
- Limited to visual annotations only
- No design principle evaluation
- Better for bugs than design quality
- No AI assistance or structured frameworks
- Limited collaboration features
Our Take: Excellent for QA and website reviews, but limited for comprehensive design critique.
Structured Critique Tools
These tools provide frameworks and criteria for systematic design evaluation.
The Crit
AI-powered design critique in seconds
Pricing
Free tier available
Pro plans from $9/month
Best For
Solo designers, rapid iteration, objective quality checks
✓ Pros
- Instant AI feedback based on design principles
- Available 24/7 without scheduling
- Consistent, objective evaluation criteria
- Educational explanations for improvement
- Works with any image or design file
- Unlimited critiques for flat monthly rate
✗ Cons
- AI may miss nuanced context or brand requirements
- No human mentorship or strategic guidance
- Better for fundamentals than high-level strategy
- Newer platform with smaller community
Our Take: Best for solo designers and rapid feedback. Great complement to human critique.
Designship
Structured design education with expert feedback
Pricing
$200-400/month
Cohort-based courses with critique included
Best For
Designers seeking structured learning and mentorship
✓ Pros
- Expert-led critique sessions
- Structured learning curriculum
- Peer feedback from other designers
- Professional mentorship and career guidance
- Community support and networking
✗ Cons
- Expensive compared to other options
- Fixed schedule and curriculum
- Limited to course participants
- Not suitable for quick, ad-hoc feedback
- Requires significant time commitment
Our Take: Excellent for structured learning, but expensive and time-intensive.
Project Management Tools
These tools integrate design feedback with broader project workflows and task management.
Linear
Project management with design review capabilities
Best for: Product teams managing design reviews as part of development
Pricing: Free for small teams, $8/user/month for unlimited
Great for linking feedback to specific features and tracking design iterations within product development workflows. Less specialized for actual design critique.
Notion
All-in-one workspace with critique templates
Best for: Teams wanting customizable critique workflows
Pricing: Free for personal use, $8-16/user/month for teams
Highly flexible for creating custom critique frameworks, but requires significant setup and maintenance. Can become overwhelming with too many features.
Video Feedback Tools
Video tools excel at explaining complex feedback with full context and nuance.
Loom
Video feedback for detailed explanations
Pricing
Free plan (25 videos/month)
$12.50/user/month for unlimited
Best For
Complex feedback that needs detailed explanation
✓ Pros
- Shows exactly what you mean with screen sharing
- Captures tone, emotion, and nuanced feedback
- Easy to record and share with anyone
- Works with any design tool or website
- Great for stakeholder presentations
✗ Cons
- Time-consuming to record comprehensive feedback
- Hard to reference specific points later
- Videos pile up and become difficult to organize
- No structured framework or design principles
- Not searchable or actionable like text feedback
Our Take: Excellent for complex explanations, but time-intensive and hard to organize.
Best Tool for Your Situation
The right critique tool depends on your team size, workflow, and feedback needs:
Solo Designer / Freelancer
→ The Crit + Loom
AI for instant feedback and quality checks, Loom for detailed client presentations. No team coordination overhead.
Small Team (2-5 designers)
→ Figma Comments + The Crit
Figma for real-time collaboration, The Crit for objective quality validation before reviews.
Design Agency
→ Markup.io + Loom + The Crit
Markup for client feedback, Loom for presentations, The Crit for internal quality control.
Design Student
→ The Crit + Designship (if budget allows)
AI for rapid learning and improvement, structured education for comprehensive development.
Product Team
→ Linear + Figma Comments
Linear for process management and cross-functional feedback, Figma for design-specific collaboration.
Remote Team
→ Notion + Loom + The Crit
Notion for async documentation, Loom for detailed explanations, The Crit for consistent quality.
Pricing Comparison
How much do these critique tools actually cost?
| Tool | Free Tier | Paid Plans | Best Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Figma Comments | Yes | Included with Figma ($15-75/user/month) | |
| Markup.io | Limited | $15-25/user/month | |
| The Crit | Yes | $9-29/month (unlimited) | |
| Designship | No | $200-400/month | |
| Linear | Small teams | $8/user/month | |
| Notion | Personal use | $8-16/user/month | |
| Loom | 25 videos/month | $12.50/user/month |
💡 Pro tip: The Crit offers the best value for unlimited feedback at a flat rate. Compare: one hour with a design consultant costs $100-200, while The Crit Pro costs $29/month for unlimited critiques.
What to Look for in a Critique Tool
When evaluating critique tools, consider these key criteria:
Feedback Quality
- Structured frameworks vs freeform comments
- Design principle guidance
- Actionable suggestions for improvement
- Consistency across reviewers
Workflow Integration
- Works with your existing design tools
- Fits your team's collaboration style
- Integrates with project management
- Easy for stakeholders to use
Speed & Availability
- Instant vs scheduled feedback
- 24/7 availability for global teams
- Time investment required
- Batch processing capabilities
Cost & Scale
- Per-user vs flat-rate pricing
- Free tier limitations
- Volume discounts for agencies
- ROI on design quality improvement
The Bottom Line
The best design critique tool depends on your specific needs, but most successful designers use 2-3 tools strategically:
- AI tools like The Crit for instant quality checks and rapid iteration
- Async tools like Figma Comments for team collaboration and stakeholder input
- Video tools like Loom for complex explanations and presentations
Start simple: Try The Crit's free tier for AI feedback, use your existing design tool's comments for collaboration, and add video feedback when needed. This covers 90% of critique needs without overwhelming your workflow.
Everything You Need to Know
Quick answers to help you get started
Stay in the Loop Design Updates
Get practical design tips and new updates. No spam, unsubscribe anytime.